Dumb question over here... if plot were a planet package then this wouldn't be an issue right?
Think it can't be because of the native libs. On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/01/2011 08:32 PM, Patrick King wrote: >> >> First, I apologize. I play "catch up" on the weekends with this list, >> and sometimes find myself responding to threads that have long ago gone >> far afield... >> >> Second, sarcasm is used far to little in this field. >> >> Instead of "plot/compat", call it "plot/old". When "plot3000" comes >> along, then the geezers like me still using the old old plot should have >> to ask for "plot/old/really-dude?", and at some point, >> "plot/old/really-dude?/you-have-been-warned". > > Ha ha! I could start with plot/antique, then go to plot/ancient, then > plot/jurassic... > > A tad more seriously, if we had a death date for the old one, I could put it > in the library name. You'd have to put > > (require plot/supported-until-2013-01-01) > > That'd drive the point home. > > Neil T > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > -- http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
