On Friday, September 30, 2011, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/30/2011 02:57 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> Neil, >> >> I don't think that this is the right call, if I understand you >> correctly. So, to double check that I understand correctly, are you >> planning to provide a compatibility layer for plot with some other name? >> If so, did you consider leaving that as the plot library for a few >> releases to give people time to migrate what they care about? > > You understand correctly, and the compatibility layer is called 'plot/compat'. > > Why would it take a few releases to change 'plot' to 'plot/compat'?
At the moment our users have noting to port *to*. it seems wrong to make these changes all at once. BTW, I think a fair interpretation of the response here is "sure I will deal with a dew pinches while you give me a nice big bowl of ice-cream". But I don't think pinching is either necessary or appropriate in this case. Robby
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
