> It's just that I don't understand why you (i.e. > Racket implementers) choose Racket by default prints list this > way (different than all other lisps). I think this choice can confuse > [...] users who switches from different lisp > implementations [...]
Then it nicely accomplishes the task of alerting them that there are many more surprises ahead. (If Racket were just the same as some other Lisp, it would have no need to exist.) Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
