It would be possible to create a CGI mode for stateless servlets though. Jay
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Joan Arnaldich <jarnald...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something worth noting is that they only offer CGI, whatever the > language... so you won't be able to run the racket web server. AFAICT, > the most cost-effective options for running the web server would still > be a virtual shared host or WebFaction. > > BTW, any experience with WebFaction? > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> On 2011-09-07 13:48:04 +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: >>> I just came across this one by accident. >>> >>> http://example.nfshost.com/versions.php >> >> FWIW, I've been using NFS for a number of years and have had a good >> experience with them. Their usage-based billing is nice for small volume >> sites and they scale the per-MB cost so that high-volume sites are >> practical too. >> >> I haven't taken advantage of their Racket/Scheme support though, so >> YMMV. >> >> Cheers, >> Asumu >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >> > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
