Thanks for the followup, Kevin. Signalling an error sounds like the right thing for the symbol case. I worry a little bit about how to phrase it so people who run places in an unsaved drracket don't get confused, tho. Maybe you have a good idea?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Kevin Tew <t...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > I'm going to add a feature that allows the user to specify file ports or > racket pipes for a new place's standard in, out, and err ports. > In the Drracket case, I'll detect that that the current-error-port isn't a > file port or racket pipe and set up an IO pump that > pumps a place's standard IO ports into the current Drracket ones. Doing something with the IO ports sounds good. Did you have in mind just passing the ports over in the case that they are file ports or pipes? That is, in all cases, you'd get something where the new place's io goes to the old place's ports? Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
