At Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:27:55 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > > Whoever made "syntax-parse" did a great job, and all the examples in the > > documentation are great. > > > > I found that "syntax-parse" is a big win for handling keyword arguments, and > > I get the impression that there are other big wins to be had from it. > > That would be Ryan Culpepper, and I agree wholeheartedly. I use > syntax-parse for pretty much all my macros these days.
+1 Syntax classes are great for structuring code. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
