Two minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> I use relative path but I started using path-up and friends because
> it looked cleaner
That solves a different issue -- one that is closer to a concept of a
"common project configuration" thing.
> (except that it doesn't jive with check-syntax so I eliminated it
> again).
(There's an open PR for it, IIRC.)
> Nevertheless, I would like to use the same syntax as for built-in
> collections to require my private project modules.
IIUC, you're several steps ahead of Ray -- at the point where you do
have your own independent library code.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
