The obvious response to a Wikipedia editor asserting that Racket is "not
very notable" is to say "citation needed". :)
But seriously, although it sounds like the editor's rationale is tinged
with opinion, it might also be the true that the page arguably doesn't
really belong in Wikipedia, even if you see an analogous page for
Haskell. Perhaps you can rethink the page, or someone can contribute
comparative discussion of why the examples are significant in a PL
context. I couldn't make a good enough case for those examples, myself.
It looks like you've done a lot of work to provide some context and
narrative for the examples from the home page. If Wikipedia doesn't use
that, perhaps there's some other place it could be used.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
