On Aug 14, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Joan Arnaldich wrote: > If the tutorials section in the article section is to stay, then I'll > add this one here, which I think is far more interesting than > mine: > > http://matt.might.net/articles/implementing-a-programming-language/
But Matt's page is just a discussion of interpreters. That's a rather different notion of implementing a language. You could do so in asm, no real tools needed. > > Speaking of the article, after Asumu's mail I started to contribute a > little bit. I was planning to focus on the practical side of Racket, > so I added a brief section on this. I would like to add a link at the end of > the section pointing at a new wikipedia page with examples on how > Racket can be used in different application domains, and to show some > of the different languages / paradigms available (a bit like the > Haskell page does in the features section)... the problem is that it > is hard to come up with better examples than the ones already at > racket-lang.org, so could I use some of those (always with the > reference)?. I think more wikipedia readers will get to see the > examples if they're in a regular wikipedia page rather than having to > click to an external link and then browse back and forth and click on > the question mark for an explanation. A very good idea. When I made screen savers for my Mac from them, I placed them on the web here (by accident): http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Presentations/10ICFP/Background/ _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
