Marijn wrote at 08/04/2011 02:50 AM:
What's wrong with ⋁ (U+22C1) and ⋀ (U+22C0)? (Also known as bigwedge and
bigvee in LaTeX.)
FWIW, I would someday like to use those symbols in some logic programming mini-language embedded in Racket code. I assume that this won't conflict linguistically with their use in other ways, although someone looking at Racket code with embedded logic programming bits might prefer to use the cute symbols for the logic bits, and the longer names like "and" in the surrounding, algorithmic Racket code, just to help visually distinguish the two languages. Both languages should provide ASCII identifiers, and cute Unicode symbol identifiers as aliases for the ASCII, so people can use which they choose.

--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to