About a minute ago, Jukka Tuominen wrote:
>
> > The sandbox is working in an isolated world (by design, of
> > course), so you need to do the (require "sb-functions.rkt") inside
> > the sandbox. For example, just use (sb-eval '(require ...)).
>
> Wouldn't that mean that the sb-evaluator has to be first initiated
> to understand 'require' plus many other primitives, not just the
> intented f1, f2, f3?
Yes.
> Is this even possible?
Yes. You can get that with
(make-evaluator 'racket/base)
If you want a limited language, then you can make up a language with
`require' and the limited set of bindings you want in. If you also
don't want `require' in the language, you can make the language itself
provide the functions that you want to make public, but not `require'
itself. Yet another option is to use `call-in-sandbox-context' with
`namespace-require'.
(All of this is much more complicated then what Matthias originally
hinted at: if you know the set of functions that you want to expose,
then you can just dispatch on the input symbols and call the
corresponding function.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
