You're correct, there is no success function in Rackunit. This will do: (lambda () 'ok)
I.e. you don't need to signal success for a test to pass. People have experimented with test frameworks where you have to signal success, but it the general conclusion is that it's too much effort for the small gain. HTH, N. > But, the second check would be nicer as (success "not found"), but I > don't see a "success" check. It is my first time using rackunit, so > maybe I'm overlooking something. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
