> HTTPS support should *really*, *really* be in Racket out of the box, > so that "get-pure-port" and friends do the right thing whether it's > HTTP or HTTPS. I'd second that...
I haven't gotten to it yet but I think serving HTTPS also requires jumping through some hoops? Anyway HTTPS is something I have to deal with all the time in my work as a web developer and I think it would help people's perception of racket as a professional web dev language if it was more out of the box. Shalom, Jordan On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 04:53:00PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 06/18/2011 04:30 PM: > >I've put all of these examples up on the GitHub Racket wiki: > > https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/HTTP-over-SSL > > > >Hopefully, that will be a useful reference the next time someone asks about > >SSL. > > HTTPS support should *really*, *really* be in Racket out of the box, > so that "get-pure-port" and friends do the right thing whether it's > HTTP or HTTPS. > > No more sending users on wild goose chases through official manuals, > and multiple wikis, and Googling through four different duplicate > archives of the email list. > > -- > http://www.neilvandyke.org/ > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
