On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I don't know about the feasibility of making one of those marshall > across a place channel but in the meantime does it make sense for you > to read the request on the main place, send the data to a separate > place to process and the send the result back? Or is most of the work > in reading and writing the data?
Well, that's what I meant by "handling all socket I/O in the 'main' place," and I'm afraid that's exactly what I want to avoid doing. -Jon > > Robby > > On Sunday, June 5, 2011, Jon Zeppieri <zeppi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is there a way to write a network server using places, where separate >> client connections would be handled by separate worker places? Since >> neither TCP listeners nor ports can be sent over a place-channel, I >> can't figure out a way of doing this short of handling all socket I/O >> in the "main" place --- the one that manages the listener. >> >> What I'd like is either for the workers to accept their own >> connections (but that would require a shared listener) or to have the >> main place accept connections but hand them off to the workers. I >> don't know if there is any way to accomplish this right now, and if >> there isn't, I don't know what the right approach would be. >> >> -Jon >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >> > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
