On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > 1. You won't be able to put these in a single file and have it work. > That's probably what's causing your problem. The R6RS doesn't specify > how libraries and top-level programs map to the file system. In > Racket, each R6RS library and each top-level program should be in a > separate file.
Really? Jesus, I thought modern tools like Racket were trying to move us *away* from the mistakes that Java et al. made. Maybe I was mistaken. On a more serious note: modular code, module systems in general, are great. Thousands of files in a single project, many of which are less than 100 lines of code, is *not* great. Multiple modules per file is an absolute must, in my humble non-Schemer (yet.) opinion. (-: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Marco Maggi <marco.maggi-i...@poste.it> wrote: > Elliott Cable wrote: >> I'm new to both Racket and Scheme; I've been reading >> through the R6RS, and I'm trying to get started with some >> simple code. > You can look at this simple pure R6 package which runs on > most of the implementations, Racket included: > > <http://github.com/marcomaggi/infix> I greatly appreciate that, Marco. I’ll give that a thorough exploration; that’s the exact sort of code I’m trying to write. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
