On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> If I move the syntax class >> definition into the bodies of define-syntax, then it works, but that >> defeats the purpose of being able to define a reusable syntax class... > > You'll need to move the syntax class definition into a separate > module, and then `require' that module `for-syntax'.
Other than the long name, would it make sense for there to be a 'define-syntax-class-for-syntax' form to avoid having to do this? --- nadeem _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
