You should use SRFI-41, as SRFI-40 is deprecated. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I've had some email discussions about this with the Racket team in the > past, so here's a quick unofficial summary of what I've learned, while > you're waiting for a more official response: > > racket/stream is not really a "stream library" by the typical Scheme > definition of stream. It's really a library to manipulate Racket's > sequence abstraction with list-like functions. The naming is > misleading. The whole library is experimental and is likely to change > and you shouldn't really be using it anyway. > > Racket does not have a built-in stream library that integrates nicely > with its sequence abstraction and uses the same naming scheme as its > built-in list functions. The srfis 40 and 41 will serve your most > basic stream needs though (I think I've had better luck with srfi41). > > I get the impression that adding a complete, tightly-integrated stream > library to Racket is of interest to the developers, but not a high > priority because: > a) There are tons of things competing for their development time, and > something like a stream library is exactly the kind of thing that > could be easily written by a motivated user. > b) They believe that Lazy Racket can be used in many situations where > you'd want to use streams. > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
