Oops... Now that has to qualify as a bug. On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Joe Marshall wrote:
> 2011/2/13 José Lopes <jose.lo...@ist.utl.pt>: >> I understand. However, not only that disregards type promotion but also is >> incoherent since (+ 0 0.0) evaluates to 0.0. > > Worse: > (min 0 1e100) => 0.0 > > -- > ~jrm _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
