> I don't think you could rebuild the > missing portion of the continuation by reinstalling it before calling > the exception handler due to dynamic-wind frames, which could notice > the exit and re-entry, and continuation barriers, which could prevent > reinstallation.
Something along this: (with-handlers ([(lambda (_) true) (lambda (x) ((car x) (cdr x)))]) (prompt (+ (control f (raise (cons f 3))) 1))) will not work? > (with a prompt handler that calls the continuation handler), What is a difference between 'prompt handler' and 'continuation handler'? > I don't think `raise' can be defined via `abort'. This is something I want to understand, as it is often said that 'raise' is implementable via 'abort'. I mean, I want to see how Racket diverges from these conventional view and, more importantly, why. Thanks, Keiko _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
