On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Jos Koot <jos.k...@telefonica.net> wrote:
> Thanks for your response, very quick as always.
> I'll try flvectors first.
> It will be like writing fortran with racket syntax.

If you use for/flvector and in-flvector (esp. the extended in-flvector
that some good fellow added) this kind of code is quite pleasant.

N.
_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to