On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > If you guys know now what the TR ":" syntax will look like for the usual > keyword arguments, I would like to know what it is.
First, if you have a preference, I'll be happy to consider it. My current idea is: (A B #:foo C -> D) (A [B #:foo C] ->* D) for mandatory and optional, respectively. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
