10 minutes ago, YC wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
>
> > Well, that would be an obvious issue... It might be possible to
> > do this if they're extended to get an output port too, something
> > like:
> >
> > (regexp-replace* #rx"foo" inp "bar" outp)
> >
> > doing the same thing as the loop that I wrote.
>
> So sounds like it can be done then? This will be a nice addition
> and make the regexp lib interface more uniform when someone gets
> around to it.
Actually, there's a problem -- there is already an optional argument
for the prefix, and if an output port is added, it should be added
before that for consistency but that will be incompatible.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
