Thanks. If I don't hear anything more I'll give it a go. Need to
learn something new... Andrew
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:54:36 -0500, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu>
wrote:
Andrew,
I am not aware of such a language, but one could easily be written in
the same vein as "#lang s-exp <MODULE>", which uses the concrete
syntax of s-expressions and the language bindings of <MODULE> for the
rest of the file. Making "#lang sweet-exp <MODULE>" do the same
thing
for sweet-expressions should be as easy as writing a sweet-expression
reader and plugging it in to syntax/module-reader.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, andrew cooke <and...@acooke.org>
wrote:
Hi,
Racket appears to be carefully implemented for multiple syntaxes.
Does that
mean that a sweet-expression (or similar) lang or reader already
exists? I
have searched around, but cannot find one.
Thanks,
Andrew
PS Sweet expressions -
http://www.dwheeler.com/readable/sweet-expressions.html
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
