A few seconds ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > It does, but not in the above where `values' plays a keyword that
> > makes it expand to (define-values (a b) (values 1 2)).
>
> That's what I said: it's highly non-obvious.
Ah -- I really didn't parse that meaning out earlier. I agree that
it's not obvious, which is why I said "obvious". I also listed how
`let' gets similar extensions to demonstrate this.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
