In case it is not clear Horace, because it is inexact, there are numbers after the decimal, representing nanoseconds, etc.
Jay On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > 30 minutes ago, Horace Dynamite wrote: >> The closest approximation I can find in the documentation is >> current-milliseconds? I require more accuracy in my project, >> specifically, nanosecond accuracy. I do apologise if I've missed >> this information in the documentation, if so can anyone point me to >> the right place? Or recommend a method to obtain more accuracy? > > There's `current-inexact-milliseconds'. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
