On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:07:02AM -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > But it > isn't about types or contracts, it's about what the semantics of > `member' should be.
Yes, this is exactly what it's about. But sometimes it's not until you see types and contracts that you realise that something is broken. -- hendrik _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
