On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> wrote: > There is no STM in Racket, so I don't see the relation. In a > transactional world, you need to know what "that" means. In Racket, > there's no cleverness. > > The refs in Clojure may be more akin to the boxes in FrTime.
ah! thanks for the help in clarifying my muddy mind :) _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
