I actually noticed a bug in the code of a large system a couple days
ago, thanks to "require"s of non-base Racket modules.
Finding the bug was prompted by a "Why does this module require *that*
module?" reaction when I was cleaning up "require"s. (Turns out someone
had mistakenly conflated two different types with similar sexp-based
representations, which might only be discovered at run time in certain
cases and perhaps in subtle ways.)
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
