On Sep 21, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > If so why are many of the combinations missing?
Because this is work in progress to support typed-based optimizations. Roughly speaking, with types TR can macro-generate code that exploits Racket's specialized primitives to an extent that eliminates a large amount of overhead -- for certain numeric programs. Problem is that it may require the programmer to work a bit harder to find the right entry point into the numeric hierarchy. I experienced this recently, too. So hang in there and enjoy TR for what it is, research in progress -- Matthias _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
