John Clements wrote:
Student: wouldn't it be cool if you could specify source-to-source translations
for languages like c++ by defining the operations at the AST level, after
they're parsed?
Me: AST level <=> s-expressions. Everyone who tries this eventually decides that it's easier to simply write their programs in the AST language (a.k.a. s-expressions).
Don't tools like Template Haskell and Camlp4/5 contradict this?
Anton
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
