On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:15 +0200, "Jos Koot" <jos.k...@telefonica.net> wrote: > A dump question, may be, and off topic too perhaps, but where are you > going > to store 1000000000x1000000000=10^18=1000 tera pixels? > Jos?
The virtual size of a canvas may be much greater than the visible part of it. Sure it would be a bit silly to request a client size of 1000000000x1000000000 pixels... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org > > [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Martin Dirichs > > Sent: 18 September 2010 22:57 > > To: users@racket-lang.org > > Subject: [racket] Limits of init-auto-scrollbars in canvas% > > > > In the docs for canvas% > > > > http://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/canvas_.html > > > > the limits for function init-auto-scrollbars are given as > > > > horiz-pixels : (or/c (integer-in 1 1000000000) false/c) > > vert-pixels : (or/c (integer-in 1 1000000000) false/c) > > > > However, if tested with larger values than 10000, the > > following error message occurs in mred: > > > > init-auto-scrollbars in canvas%: expected argument of type > > <exact integer in [1, 10000]>; given 100000 > > > > This seems to be a discrepancy between documentation and > > implementation. I would much prefer the limits given in the > > documentation, as a maximum virtual height for a canvas of > > 10000 is severely limiting its usefulness (at least for me, I > > am trying to display large tables with it). > > > > Is there any chance that the limits given in the > > documentation are also applied in the implementation? > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
