On Sep 9, David Van Horn wrote:
>
> [...] As for the structure of the code as given, I would use helper
> functions in place of the `let'. The resulting code will be easier
> to read and the helper functions can be tested independently, making
> it easier to maintain and improve the likelihood that the whole
> program is correct; and correctness and ease of maintenance are
> important aspects of style.
Sounds like an overkill in this case, and for most values of
"idiomatic" I'd say that it'd make it less so.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
