On Aug 24, Will M. Farr wrote:
>
> So, I guess the answer to my question is: "there is no limit on
> apply that takes effect before basic memory limits". Hopefully
> others will find this useful as well.
A relevant point here is the `append*' function which does what you
want without using `apply'. It's irrelevant in terms of speed (since
it does the appending using the same `apply append' thing), but it's
relevant in that if there was a limit on the number of arguments then
it would need to deal with it -- therefore making it someone else's
problem instead of your own.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
