On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Is this the same as the (brand-new) `for/flvector' and `in-flvector'?
At the moment, these do not use the unsafe-... variants (though I can eventually change them to do so). Is Typed-Scheme smart enough to change them over even if I don't specify when somebody provides the correct flags? Will _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
