+1, jos > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen > Sent: 13 August 2010 23:19 > To: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > Cc: [email protected]; Joe Marshall > Subject: Re: [racket] question about foldl implementation > > > I privately +1ed Joe, and I all supportive of introducing new > folds and phasing out the old ones. > > > On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Joe Marshall > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It seems to me that the Haskell version is better. > > > > The Haskell ordering also has the advantage of fitting with > the Typed > > Racket type system for variable-arity functions. > > -- > > sam th > > [email protected] > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
