On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Deren Dohoda <deren.doh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 4) Well, *I* have no clue what you want, so I'll just create this view > called a "sequence" and give you that (oh yeah it just acts like a > list)
[...] > they use a list in the first place?). I don't believe (4) is so much a > "solution" as a way to relocate the problem to post-processing of your > containter-viewed-through-a-sequence rather than pre-processing by > selecting the right function in the first place. It's then the compiler's job to specialise your map function for your container. You get the benefits of conceptually treating the vector as an abstract sequence, while concretely having your functions specialised for your specific container, and only having to make the implementation decision at a single point in the code. martin _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
