> I suppose you're right, but you (aren't you one of the maintainers?) > may not be a good judge of whether the documentation has enough > examples for the ''everyday programming'' folks Racket is targeting.
No, I'm not one of the maintainers :-). I'm still very much a newbie in computing. > I agree with you that docs can always be improved with some choice > examples. Thanks for thinking to contribute. In this regard, Horace > is being perhaps a bit too defensive. I didn't mean to be defensive. I decided to work a little through the SICP book, using MIT Scheme. Now, going from Rackets documentation to MIT Schemes was a big shock. Most of the documentation I've read for other software I use on my computer was also much less useful than I found Rackets. I've perhaps been skewed by a poor sample here, but I don't think its accurate to suggest Racket doesn't have good documentation (not perfect!) Horace. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
