> -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org > [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Horace Dynamite > Sent: 02 August 2010 16:31 > To: Robby Findler; users@racket-lang.org > Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently > > > That said, if you hit return after each 'cond' (instead of > keeping the > > first clause on the same line), you're down to 82 chars. If > you break > > define definitions in the innermost local, you're below the > limit. I > > personally would probably also put a return after the call to > > make-state, getting me to this, at 74 cols in the widest line. > > Okay, you win! > Having analyzed over 40 sections of code from HtDP using the > find command, I only found 6 instances where I'd gone over > the 80 character limit (comments and #reader(lib ...) stuff > greped out). > > So I suppose I was being a little too aggressive at the > suggestion. I do wonder how tricky it will be do have a > line-breaking routine that can take as input the program I > posted, and produce as output the program you returned.
I once had such a program, but I never used it. Don't know whether or not I can retrieve it from archives. Jos > > Thanks for your time. > > Horace. > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
