On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Skeptic . <skeptic2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I was trying to come up with a naive implementation of check-expect/test and > I found out that if a macro expands to a set! on a module-level variable > directly, an error will be given when using the macro from another module. A > simple fix seems to instead have the macro to expands to a function call that > performs the set!.
That's correct. A `set!' must be in the same module as the one that defines the variable being mutated. And your fix of creating a mutator function is also correct. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
