> > But I feel like it may not be the right thing to do. Am I missing > something? > > The right way to do this is to create a separate module, and then > `require' it both `for-syntax' and normally. >
Excellent! This is even better, because `define-for-syntax' doe not know about optional parameters. Thanks again, Sam.
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
