2010/6/18 Kyle Smith <noreply-comm...@blogger.com>:
> Kyle Smith has left a new comment on your post "Racket":
>
> Racket is just an organized scheme. The name still brings up connotations of
> something nefarious. What is in a name? I'm good with it if it continues to
> run on a proper OpenBSD platform. Will Apple let something, so expressive as
> ‘Racket’, the honor of being available from their apps store, for use with
> the iPad? Now that would be the app to write, however, unless Apple has
> changed their minds, no interpretive languages, that I'm aware of, have made
> it to iTunes.
In the latest agreement Apple changed the wording to:
Unless otherwise approved by Apple in writing, no interpreted code may
be downloaded or used in an Application except for code that is interpreted
and run by Apple’s Documented APIs and built-in interpreter(s).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with Apple’s prior written consent,
an Application
may use embedded interpreted code in a limited way if such use is solely
for providing minor features or functionality that are consistent with the
intended and advertised purpose of the Application.
This means that if Racket gets an Arm port, it is possible to use it.
MzScheme used to have an Arm port, but I am somewhat unsure,
whether it has survived the test of time. Has it survived?
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
