Sorry that I lost track of that one --- fix pushed.
At Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:37:32 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > This is PR 10954. > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Todd O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's a minimal example of what I think is a bug: > > > > #lang racket > > > > (define (blah #:foo foo #:bar bar) > > (+ foo 2)) > > > > (blah #:bar 3) > > > > Running it causes: > > > > blah: requires an argument with keyword #:foo, not supplied; x: > > expects type <x> as 1st argument, given: 'x; other arguments were: > > '#:bar 3 > > > > where the error information involving x is just bizarre. I'm guessing > > that's not intended behavior... > > > > Todd > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > > > > -- > sam th > [email protected] > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
