Darrin, list- I'm sure there's people on this list with better answers, so I'll throw in first with what might be the wrong answer (but feels right to me), and say you more or less need to report all of them: like, show a full histogram of the p-values. At least, as a reviewer, that is what would convince me whether there was evidence or not to reject a hypothesis.
But I'm sure there's some statistical argument again that too, in terms of taking a frequentist perspective across multiple versions of the same dataset. To the list: I look forward to hearing how I am wrong! ;) -Dave On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Darrin Hulsey <darrinhulseymin...@outlook.com> wrote: > I am running a series of statistics on a subset of 100 trees that returns 100 > different p-values. I was wondering what the best way to report summary > statistics for these 100 p-values would be (median?, measure of variance in > all 100 p-values?). Thanks for any insight. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo > Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/ -- David W. Bapst, PhD Adjunct Asst. Professor, Geology and Geol. Eng. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology 501 E. St. Joseph Rapid City, SD 57701 http://webpages.sdsmt.edu/~dbapst/ http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/paleotree/index.html _______________________________________________ R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/
