Hi Simon, Thanks for following up.
I presumed that this was a production issue of some nature, as you had established the pattern of digitally signing the binaries some time ago. Thanks again! Marc > On Mar 14, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urba...@r-project.org> > wrote: > > Marc, > > thanks, I'm glad that at least someone pays attention and checks the > signature ;). I'm surprised my machine didn't raise a flag - I did test the > image locally from the master URL before releasing. > > I have now updated the package to be signed, it is identical content, just > signed. You can get is from the Mac master server > https://mac.R-project.org/bin/macosx now and other CRAN servers will sync in > due time. > > Thanks, > Simon > > > >> On Mar 14, 2019, at 8:18 AM, Marc Schwartz via R-SIG-Mac >> <r-sig-mac@r-project.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just tried to install the R 3.5.3 macOS binary from CRAN. >> >> The SHA hash matches what is on CRAN, but I get an unknown developer message >> when I try to install. >> >> I get: >> >> pkgutil --check-signature R-3.5.3.pkg >> Package "R-3.5.3.pkg": >> Status: no signature >> >> >> I rechecked the 3.5.2 binary and do not have the issue there. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Marc Schwartz >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Mac mailing list >> R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac > _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
