В Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:10:21 -0400 "Kevin R. Coombes" <kevin.r.coom...@gmail.com> пишет:
> But version R 4.5.0 RC comes back with; > (possibly) invalid URL. Status: 403 Message: Forbidden > I copied the URL as reported in the error message, pasted it into my > browser, and it worked just fine. > > Can I assume that this is just something weird about the > corresponding winbuilder server at the moment, and go ahead and > submit the package? This is a false positive. R CMD check sends automated requests to all URLs it finds in the package. PubMed "protects" itself from automated requests and returns an error code: $ curl -I https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2730180/ HTTP/2 403 content-length: 134 content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 15:14:59 GMT alt-svc: clear Using a browser instead results in subtly different behaviour visible to the server, so the page loads successfully when clicking a link. I see you're already linking to the article's DOI, 10.4137/cin.s2846, and the article is not paywalled. Is it an option to remove the PubMed link? There is code that is intended to recommend to only use the DOI, but currently doesn't include a pattern for the new PubMed URLs: if(length(y) && any(ind <- (grepl(re_or(c("^https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/[0-9]+";, "^https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC[0-9]+/$";, "^https://academic.oup.com/.*(/[0-9]*){4}$", "^https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article";)), y$URL)))) { ## <FIXME> ## Ideally we would complain about such URLs in general ## and not only when the URL checks were not OK. paste(c("Please use DOIs for the following publisher URLs:", paste0(" ", y$URL[ind])), collapse = "\n") ## </FIXME> } If you don't want to remove the PubMed link, you can explain the "possibly invalid URL" as a false positive in the submission comment. -- Best regards, Ivan ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
