On 6 June 2024 at 04:47, Paul Kabaila wrote:
| When I resubmitted, I didn't realise that I needed to change the version
number.
As this comes up every now and then: This is still a _soft_ requirement. CRAN
does not 'cache' what versions you used in uploads. I have often reiterated
with the same number.
And small add if you like the command-line (in a responsive way) better than
a browser, package `ciw` on CRAN and the example script ciw.r (in `littler`,
only at github yet) make 'spying' at incoming quite easy and
convenient. Right now and showing the default view as well as some options:
edd@rob:~$ ciw.r
Folder Name Time Size Age
<char> <char> <POSc> <char> <difftime>
1: pretest ppgm_1.0.1.tar.gz 2024-06-07 15:55:00 2.7M 0.25 hours
2: pretest AirExposure_1.0.tar.gz 2024-06-07 15:47:00 5.3M 0.38 hours
3: recheck cna_3.6.0.tar.gz 2024-06-07 15:36:00 915K 0.57 hours
4: inspect admiral_1.1.0.tar.gz 2024-06-07 14:27:00 1.5M 1.72 hours
5: waiting TreeTools_1.11.1.tar.gz 2024-06-07 07:37:00 938K 8.55 hours
6: pending robusTest_1.1.0.tar.gz 2024-06-06 23:27:00 2.8M 16.72 hours
7: waiting boot_1.3-31.tar.gz 2024-06-06 22:17:00 228K 17.88 hours
8: pending kit_0.0.18.tar.gz 2024-06-06 20:01:00 89K 20.15 hours
9: inspect geodata_0.6-2.tar.gz 2024-06-06 12:00:00 55K 28.17 hours
10: pending duckdb_1.0.0.tar.gz 2024-06-06 08:15:00 4.0M 31.92 hours
11: waiting hdsvm_1.0.1.tar.gz 2024-06-06 04:08:00 35K 36.03 hours
12: waiting hdqr_1.0.1.tar.gz 2024-06-06 03:49:00 35K 36.35 hours
13: waiting cofid_1.0.1.tar.gz 2024-06-03 21:53:00 1.2M 90.28 hours
14: waiting Matrix_1.7-0.tar.gz 2024-03-20 17:41:00 2.3M 1893.48 hours
edd@rob:~$ ciw.r --help
Usage: ciw.r [-h] [-x] [-a] [-m] [-i] [-t] [-p] [-w] [-r] [-s] [-n] [-u] [-l
rows] [-z] [ARG...]
-m --mega use 'mega' mode of all folders (see --usage)
-i --inspect visit 'inspect' folder
-t --pretest visit 'pretest' folder
-p --pending visit 'pending' folder
-w --waiting visit 'waiting' folder
-r --recheck visit 'recheck' folder
-a --archive visit 'archive' folder
-n --newbies visit 'newbies' folder
-u --publish visit 'publish' folder
-s --skipsort skip sorting of aggregate results by age
-l --lines rows print top 'rows' of the result object [default: 50]
-z --ping run the connectivity check first
-h --help show this help text
-x --usage show help and short example usage
edd@rob:~$
Calling `ciw::ciw()` from your R prompt of course also works (if that is your
jam).
Dirk
|
| I changed the version number of my package from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 and the
resubmission worked fine.
|
| Paul Kabaila
|
| From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org> On Behalf Of
Ben Bolker
| Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 8:08 AM
| To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
| Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] No email with confirmation link on resubmission of
package
|
| You don't often get email from bbol...@gmail.com<mailto:bbol...@gmail.com>.
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
| Check your spam folder(s) ?
|
| Try the web form
<https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html<https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html>>
just in
| case something is wonky with devtools::submit_cran() ?
|
|
|
| On 2024-06-05 4:19 a.m., Paul Kabaila wrote:
| > (1) Today, I submitted my R package to CRAN using
| > devtools::submit_cran()
| > which resulted in an email from
| > CRAN Package Submission Form
cransub...@xmbombadil.wu.ac.at<mailto:cransub...@xmbombadil.wu.ac.at<mailto:cransub...@xmbombadil.wu.ac.at%3cmailto:cransub...@xmbombadil.wu.ac.at>>
| > with a confirmation link, which I clicked on.
| >
| > (2) I was then sent an email from
| >
lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de%3cmailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>
| > which notified that my package "does not pass the incoming checks
automatically",
| > with 0 errors, 0 warnings and 2 notes.
| >
| >
| > (3) I then fixed the problem for one of the notes and explained the reason
for the
| > other note and put this information into the file
| > cran-comments.md
| > Then I resubmitted my R package to CRAN using
| > devtools::submit_cran()
| >
| > However, this time I did not receive an email with a confirmation link.
| >
| > Has my package been resubmitted or do I need to resubmit it in some
different way?
| >
| > Paul Kabaila
| >
| >
| > La Trobe University | TEQSA PRV12132 - Australian University | CRICOS
Provider 00115M
| >
| > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
| >
| > ______________________________________________
| > R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing
list
| >
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
|
| ______________________________________________
| R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing
list
|
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
|
| La Trobe University | TEQSA PRV12132 - Australian University | CRICOS
Provider 00115M
|
| [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
|
| ______________________________________________
| R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
