On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:41 AM Uwe Ligges
<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
>
> On 18.04.2024 15:35, Ben Bolker wrote:
> > Yes, but ffbase was archived a long time ago (2022-04-04) and CRAN
> > has apparently just caught up to checking. What's a little frustrating
> > (to me) is that the dependence of prediction on ffbase is *very* soft
> > ("enhances") ...
>
> No, but CRAN has still not received an update and asked for this each
> month this year, so in Jan, Feb, and March without a response, so we
> assume prediction is unmaintained. Also, this was escalated to reverse
> depends.
Uwe, has the CRAN Team ever considered making these request-for-update
email messages from CRAN public in real-time? For instance, there
could be a public "read-only" mailing list that anyone can subscribe
to, but not send/reply to. I see several advantages with such an
approach, e.g.
* maintainers of reverse dependencies would be aware of potential
problems much sooner,
* so would end-users who rely on the package (who often only notice
when a package is archived),
* the community could early on offer their help to the package maintainer, and
* the community could help locate and notify maintainers whose email
addresses are no longer working.
I'd imagine this would help lower the workload on the CRAN Team, so a
win-win for everyone. I, for sure, would find that useful.
Thanks,
Henrik
>> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
> >
> > On 2024-04-18 9:28 a.m., Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
> >> The cascade is even longer. prediction got archived because ffbase was
> >> no longer available. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ffbase/
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ffbase/>
> >>
> >> ir. Thierry Onkelinx
> >> Statisticus / Statistician
> >>
> >> Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders
> >> INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE
> >> AND FOREST
> >> Team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / Team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
> >> thierry.onkel...@inbo.be <mailto:thierry.onkel...@inbo.be>
> >> Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussel
> >> *Postadres:* Koning Albert II-laan 15 bus 186, 1210 Brussel
> >> /Poststukken die naar dit adres worden gestuurd, worden ingescand en
> >> digitaal aan de geadresseerde bezorgd. Zo kan de Vlaamse overheid haar
> >> dossiers volledig digitaal behandelen. Poststukken met de vermelding
> >> ‘vertrouwelijk’ worden niet ingescand, maar ongeopend aan de
> >> geadresseerde bezorgd./
> >> www.inbo.be <http://www.inbo.be>
> >>
> >> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no
> >> more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be
> >> able to say what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
> >> The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
> >> The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does
> >> not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body
> >> of data. ~ John Tukey
> >> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> <https://www.inbo.be>
> >>
> >>
> >> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 15:25 schreef Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:bbol...@gmail.com>>:
> >>
> >> Thank you! (I know about package_dependencies() but ran into
> >> precisely the same problem and didn't want to re-implement it ...)
> >>
> >> On 2024-04-18 9:11 a.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
> >> > Well, after trying to install the package, I believe the issue is
> >> > because margins has been archived.
> >> >
> >> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/index.html
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/index.html>
> >> > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/index.html
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/index.html>>
> >> >
> >> > You can check recursive dependencies using
> >> > `tools::package_dependencies("pkg", recursive = TRUE)` which
> >> would help
> >> > you in this case. I couldn't run it since the package is not
> >> available
> >> > on CRAN, however.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:05 AM Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:bbol...@gmail.com>
> >> > <mailto:bbol...@gmail.com <mailto:bbol...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The 'dotwhisker' package was archived on CRAN: from
> >> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dotwhisker/index.html
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dotwhisker/index.html>
> >> >
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dotwhisker/index.html
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dotwhisker/index.html>>
> >> >
> >> > Package ‘dotwhisker’ was removed from the CRAN
> >> repository
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >> > Archived on 2024-04-12 as requires archived package
> >> 'prediction'.
> >> >
> >> > However, I can't for the life of me see where this
> >> dependence
> >> > could
> >> > come from. Neither the DESCRIPTION file of the last-archived
> >> version on
> >> > CRAN
> >> >
> >>
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/dotwhisker/dotwhisker_0.8.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/dotwhisker/dotwhisker_0.8.1.tar.gz>
> >>
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/dotwhisker/dotwhisker_0.8.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/dotwhisker/dotwhisker_0.8.1.tar.gz>>>,
> >> > nor the version on github
> >> <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker
> >> <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker>
> >> > <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker
> >> <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker>>>, seem to
> >> > show any signs of importing prediction ... ?? I suppose
> >> there's a
> >> > possibility of a recursive dependence, but in that case why
> >> wouldn't
> >> > the
> >> > direct dependence be reported?
> >> >
> >> > Depends: R (>= 3.2.0), ggplot2 (>= 2.2.1),
> >> > Imports: grid, gtable, gridExtra, stats, parameters,
> >> performance,
> >> > patchwork, margins, dplyr, stringr, ggstance,
> >> rlang, purrr
> >> > Suggests: ordinal, tibble, knitr, rmarkdown, broom
> >> >
> >> > What am I missing?
> >> >
> >> > (I'm concerned because I have packages that Suggest:
> >> dotwhisker,
> >> > and
> >> > the absence of the package from repos is breaking GitHub
> >> Actions
> >> > checks ...)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > (This is cross-posted from an issue on the dotwhisker GH
> >> > repository:
> >> > https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker/issues/115
> >> <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker/issues/115>
> >> > <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker/issues/115
> >> <https://github.com/fsolt/dotwhisker/issues/115>>)
> >> >
> >> > ______________________________________________
> >> > R-package-devel@r-project.org
> >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
> >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org
> >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>
> >> > mailing list
> >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> >> > <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>
> >> >
> >>
> >> -- Dr. Benjamin Bolker
> >> Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University
> >> Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering
> >> (Acting) Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
> >> > E-mail is sent at my convenience; I don't expect replies
> >> outside of
> >> working hours.
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________
> >> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
> >> mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> >>
> >
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
