I'm not even asking for that. I'm asking for the decades old ustar 
comparability, which is 255 characters, at most. In practice it is slightly 
less than that. ustar is older than R itself. There is no one using R who 
doesn't have ustar compatible tar.

________________________________________
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 8:59 AM
To: Tomas Kalibera
Cc: McGrath, Justin M; Ben Bolker; Martin Maechler; 
r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel]  Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length 
limit be lifted?


On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
| Please don't forget about what has been correctly mentioned on this
| thread already: there is essentially a 260 character limit on Windows
| (see
| 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.r-project.org/2023/03/07/path-length-limit-on-windows/index.html__;!!DZ3fjg!-YZg5PVpulgNXCVfVklP442UG_0ofB8omMLlMq5dNadF9RP_6uofnrT6IbZpG1fpvjmAtLyAm1Y9rbc$
| for more). Even if the relative path length limit for a CRAN package was
| no longer regarded important for tar compatibility, it would still make
| sense for compatibility with Windows. It may still be a good service to
| your users if you keep renaming the files to fit into that limit.

So can lift the limit from 100 char to 260 char ?

Dirk

--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to