On 10/11/2023 1:35 p.m., Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
Good day development team, I trust this email finds you well.
I am trying to upload a package onto CRAN. Note that this is a second
version of an existing package on CRAN, called iopspackage. I have built
the package using the R CMD build function and checked the function using R
CMD check --as cran--. The check yields 3 notes. 2 of them are regarding
run time and big file sizes, which is expected and I can't fix since it is
external functions used in my package that take that much time and a big
example file required.
You will have to fix the run time. Try running the example on a smaller
dataset, or don't run it at all (by putting it in \donttest{}). The file
size may be acceptable to CRAN; you will need to make an argument to
them in your upload.
The note about the "\_" entries comes from "country\_codes\_V202201"
(and similar). That's not legal Rd syntax. You could use
"\code{country_codes_V202201}" or some other verbatim wrapper.
I see a 4th note, about files Combined_Results.csv and
Combined_Results.xlsx. If those files are produced by an example or
test, they should be in tempdir().
Duncan Murdoch
The 3rd note I do not know how to solve. I submitted
this file but it did not pass the automatic checks. Please see the part
from the CRAN-submission email below, as well as my attached .tar.gz file.
Any assistance to get this package open-source uploaded to CRAN would be
appreciated, thank you!
Kind regards
Christiaan
*CRAN-submission email:*
Dear maintainer,
package iopspackage_2.1.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/iopspackage_2.1.0_20231109_155428/Windows/00check.log
Status: 3 NOTEs
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/iopspackage_2.1.0_20231109_155428/Debian/00check.log
Status: 4 NOTEs
Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on
the R-package-devel mailing list:
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
reply-all to this message and explain.
More details are given in the directory:
<
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/iopspackage_2.1.0_20231109_155428/
The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.
Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE
Maintainer: 'C.J Pieterse <pietie.cjp.1...@gmail.com>'
New submission
Size of tarball: 10537094 bytes
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: Rd files, Result: NOTE
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:17: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_ \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:36: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:42: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:44: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:46: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:48: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_ \_
checkRd: (-1) IOPS.Rd:50: Escaped LaTeX specials: \_
Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
IOPS 127.61 5.58 133.2
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
user system elapsed
IOPS 170.57 2.971 173.549
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: for non-standard things in the check directory, Result: NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
'Combined_Results.csv' 'Combined_Results.xlsx'
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
