Could you have been caught out with the precompiled binary that serde started distributing in a few of it’s versions (https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2538)? That could have been a reason if you pinned a version with it present but only CRAN could confirm if that was the reason.
Tim > On 26 Aug 2023, at 22:22, Ivan Krylov <krylov.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:46:44 +0900 > SHIMA Tatsuya <ts1s1a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I noticed that my submitted package `prqlr` 0.5.0 was archived from >> CRAN on 2023-08-19. >> <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prqlr> >> >> I submitted prqlr 0.5.0 on 2023-08-13. I believe I have since only >> received word from CRAN that it passed the automated release process. > > Sarah gave a good guess (although there are CRAN packages containing > C++ and Rust code with NOTEs about size of their libs, 18.2Mb is still > a lot), though I do find it strange that you didn't receive anything > from CRAN prior to having your package archived. I don't think I ever > had problems with e-mails being delivered from CRAN to GMail, but we > can't rule that out. > > You've obviously made an effort to follow the Rust policy, and I don't > see any obvious problems with this part of the package, although I > haven't tried it myself to verify the installation working offline from > bundled source code. > > You've also made an effort to list all the authors of the code > comprising your package in inst/AUTHORS, which is the right thing to do > to avoid making the list of authors in DESCRIPTION long enough to be > unreadable. > > You licensed the package as MIT. Are your dependencies compatible with > MIT? All direct dependencies of your Rust code seem to be licensed > under either MIT or Apache-2.0, which seems to be compatible. You named > the copyright holder of your package as "prqlr authors", which may be a > problem. (I think I saw it somewhere that for MIT license, CRAN prefers > the copyright holder to be some kind of legal entity: either the legal > name of a person, or a company, or something like that.) > > Could the Rust code or any of the dependencies accidentally write under > the user's home directory or take over the terminal or something like > that? > > We might need a response from CRAN after all. > > -- > Best regards, > Ivan > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
